Expert orthopedic opinion · Non-Surgical Orthobiologics · Glastonbury, CT

Surgeon vs. Non-Surgical Orthopedic Doctor in Glastonbury, CT

Both can be reasonable choices for orthopedic treatment, but they're suited to different needs. Dr. Paul Tortland has spent over 30 years focused entirely on non-surgical orthobiologic medicine, and refers patients to surgery when that's genuinely the better option for them.

Performed by Dr. Tortland personally30+ years, non-surgical focusRefers to surgery when appropriate

Quick answer

Diagnosis first, surgery last.
Dr. Paul Tortland, DO, has spent over 30 years focused helping patients avoid orthopedic surgery with non-surgical orthopedic treatment options and regenerative medicine, evaluating every patient thoroughly to provide the best alternatives to orthopedic surgery, and recommending surgery when it's genuinely the better option for that patient.

Initial evaluation

At least 60- 90 minutes, unhurried, unrushed, untimed.

Same-visit imaging

Live musculoskeletal ultrasound included

Board certifications

Dual board certified: Sports Medicine & OMM & Regenerative Medicine, Fellowship-trained in Sports Medicine

Experience

30+ years, non-surgical orthobiologics

Care philosophy

Validate, Investigate, Regenerate

When surgery fits better

Explained clearly, with trusted surgical referrals

Practice focus

100% non-surgical care, no surgical practice

Insurance

Not covered; but HSA / FSA applicable

Two paths

How the two paths differ

Same treatment, different training and focus.

Orthopedic surgeons are trained first and foremost as surgeons; PRP and other regenerative treatments are typically one offering among many, alongside surgical repair and joint replacement. That breadth is valuable when surgery is on the table.

Non-surgical orthobiologic specialists take a different path: their entire practice is built around regenerative and joint-preservation medicine. Dr. Tortland has spent more than three decades in sports medicine and non-surgical orthopedics, and built his practice around one question for every patient: what non-surgical option, if any, will actually help this specific joint?

  • A patient who already knows they need surgery benefits from a surgeon's continuity of care
  • A patient exploring whether they can avoid or delay surgery benefits from a physician whose full-time expertise is in exactly that question
  • Every new patient gets a comprehensive evaluation, including live ultrasound, before any treatment is discussed
  • Dr. Tortland refers to a trusted orthopedic surgeon whenever surgery is genuinely the better path for that patient

Decision points

When each path fits best

When non-surgical care may be appropriate
  • Mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis with preserved joint space
  • Tendon or ligament injury without a full-thickness tear requiring repair
  • Wanting to delay or potentially avoid surgery and understand the realistic odds of benefit
  • Not yet had a structured non-surgical evaluation, including diagnostic ultrasound
  • Want a physician whose full-time focus is non-surgical joint preservation
  • Want an honest, unhurried evaluation before any treatment is discussed
When surgery may be appropriate
  • Advanced, bone-on-bone arthritis with significant joint space loss
  • Structural instability, full-thickness tears, or mechanical blockage
  • Failed non-surgical treatment with ongoing functional limitation
  • Imaging shows a structural problem regenerative treatment cannot resolve
  • Dr. Tortland will say so directly and refer to a trusted orthopedic surgeon
  • The goal is always the outcome that's best for the patient, not a specific procedure

Frequently asked

Patient questions

Should I see an orthopedic surgeon first, or a non-surgical specialist?

In most cases, start with a non-surgical specialist. A thorough non-surgical evaluation, including live ultrasound, does not close off surgery as an option. It simply makes sure surgery gets recommended only when it is genuinely necessary, not by default. If non-surgical treatment will not help, or imaging shows a structural problem it cannot fix, Dr. Tortland will say so directly and refer you to a trusted orthopedic surgeon. A surgeon's first opinion comes from someone trained primarily to operate; a non-surgical specialist's first opinion gives you an unbiased read on whether you need surgery at all before you commit to that path.

How does Dr. Tortland determine if I am a good candidate for PRP or Stem Cell therapy?

Every new patient receives a comprehensive evaluation, including a live musculoskeletal ultrasound exam in the same visit. Dr. Tortland assesses joint space, alignment, and tissue condition alongside your symptoms and goals to determine whether PRP is likely to provide meaningful benefit.

How is Dr. Tortland's PRP prepared, and why does it matter?

PRP is prepared through custom laboratory processing rather than a single fixed protocol. Baseline blood counts are measured for each patient, unwanted red and white blood cells are minimized, and platelets are concentrated to 12 to 15 times baseline levels, then delivered under direct ultrasound guidance. PRP concentration varies significantly by preparation method, and most patients aren't aware of this difference before treatment.

Will Dr. Tortland tell me if I actually need surgery instead of PRP?

Yes. Dr. Tortland is focused on getting each patient the best outcome, not on performing a specific procedure. When evaluation and imaging show that surgery is the more appropriate path, he explains why clearly and refers the patient to a trusted orthopedic surgeon.

Is what Dr. Tortland offers the same as "stem cell therapy" advertised elsewhere?

Not exactly, and the distinction matters. Dr. Tortland performs bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) procedures that are same-day and autologous (your own tissue), containing a mix of cell types including adult progenitor cells. This is different from cultured or expanded "stem cell" products some clinics market, which are not FDA-approved and carry more regulatory and safety uncertainty. Dr. Tortland only uses same-day, minimally manipulated autologous tissue.

How long does it take to see results from bone marrow or fat-derived cellular therapy?

Timelines vary by patient and by what's being treated. Most patients notice gradual improvement between 6 and 16 weeks as inflammation settles and tissue responds, and improvement can continue for up to a year; response isn't guaranteed for everyone. Dr. Tortland sets expectations at your evaluation based on your specific diagnosis and imaging, not a generic timeline.

Is cellular orthobiologic (stem cell) therapy safe?

Because BMA and MFAT use your own tissue, processed same-day and not cultured or expanded, the risk profile is favorable. Most patients experience only mild, short-term soreness at the collection and injection sites. As with any procedure, it isn't right for every patient or every diagnosis; candidacy is determined by exam and live ultrasound, not assumed from a phone call.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Request an orthopedic opinion

Candidacy for surgery vs non-orthopedic treatment is determined with precise diagnostic evaluation, MRI / x-ray review, and musculoskeltal ultrasound imaging. Bring your imaging and get an honest answer in one visit.