Evaluation for hip and knee arthritis in Glastonbury, CT
Dr. Paul Tortland, DO provides comprehensive orthopedic evaluations for patients at his Glastonbury, CT office. The practice sees patients from Glastonbury, Hartford, West Hartford, Farmington, Simsbury, South Windsor, and other Connecticut and New England communities.
📍 59 Sycamore Street, Suite 301, Glastonbury, CT 06033 — Get directions
📞 (860) 430-2821
Learn more about Dr. Tortland · Request an evaluation
What does the evidence show about PRP for hip and knee arthritis? Research suggests PRP may improve pain and function for some people with osteoarthritis, particularly earlier-stage disease. Results vary by joint, disease severity, study design, PRP preparation, injection protocol and patient characteristics. PRP does not regrow lost articular cartilage.
For treatment details and Connecticut care, see PRP for Knee Arthritis in Connecticut.
What PRP is and what it aims to do for hip and knee arthritis
Platelet-rich plasma is prepared from a patient's own blood and contains concentrated platelets and signaling proteins. For arthritis, the goal is symptom improvement and better function in appropriately selected patients, not replacement of cartilage that has already been lost.
What trials show about PRP for knee osteoarthritis
Knee osteoarthritis has a larger PRP evidence base than hip osteoarthritis. Randomized trials and systematic reviews have reported improvements in pain and function in selected patients, including comparisons with hyaluronic acid and other injections. However, studies differ substantially in PRP preparation, dose, injection schedule, patient selection and follow-up, so results should not be reduced to a single success rate or universal treatment protocol.
Some reviews report more durable symptom improvement with PRP than with corticosteroid injections, particularly over longer follow-up. Other analyses find smaller or inconsistent differences depending on the comparison and study design. The appropriate interpretation is that PRP is a reasonable option for selected patients, not that it is universally superior to every alternative.
What trials show about PRP for hip osteoarthritis
Hip OA has fewer clinical trials than knee OA. Systematic reviews and randomized studies have reported improvements in pain and function after intra-articular PRP in selected patients, but the evidence remains more limited and heterogeneous than the knee literature. Comparative studies with hyaluronic acid have produced variable findings, including some evidence of similar short-term benefit.
Who may benefit from PRP for hip or knee osteoarthritis
Evidence is generally more favorable for selected patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis than for advanced, bone-on-bone disease. A proper evaluation should consider imaging, examination findings, prior treatment, functional limitations and patient goals before deciding whether PRP is reasonable.
When surgery is the better option for hip or knee arthritis
When imaging shows advanced structural disease, major deformity, significant instability or symptoms that substantially impair daily life despite appropriate non-surgical care, a surgical evaluation may be appropriate. PRP does not replace a joint replacement when joint replacement is the appropriate treatment.
What PRP does not do for osteoarthritis
- PRP does not cure osteoarthritis.
- PRP does not reliably regrow lost articular cartilage.
- PRP does not work for every patient.
- Results are not guaranteed or necessarily permanent.
- Preparation matters. Platelet concentration, total dose, leukocyte content and processing methods vary among systems and studies.
Dr. Tortland's view on PRP for hip versus knee arthritis
"Hip and knee arthritis get lumped together a lot, but the evidence base isn't the same for both, and I think it's important to say that plainly rather than blur the distinction," says Dr. Tortland. Having added PRP to his practice in 2007, long before it became a mainstream treatment, he's watched the evidence mature unevenly across joints. "Knee PRP has a much larger body of research behind it at this point than hip PRP does," he says. "I'll still offer PRP for an appropriate hip arthritis patient, but I tell them directly that we're working with a thinner evidence base there, and that itself is relevant to deciding whether it's worth trying."
PRP compared with cortisone and hyaluronic acid injections
Corticosteroid injections may provide faster short-term relief for some patients. PRP may provide more durable improvement for some patients, but comparative findings vary. Repeated corticosteroid exposure should be discussed with the treating clinician in the context of the patient's diagnosis, frequency of injections and available alternatives rather than described as universally damaging.
Hyaluronic acid is another non-surgical option. Some studies favor PRP at longer follow-up, while others show smaller differences. Treatment choice should be individualized.
Why PRP results vary between patients and PRP systems
PRP is not one standardized product. Platelet dose, leukocyte content, preparation method, injection technique and patient selection can all influence outcomes. This variation is an important limitation when comparing studies or commercial PRP systems.
Dr. Tortland's approach: diagnosis, measured PRP and image guidance
Dr. Tortland's approach emphasizes diagnosis first, measurement of the PRP preparation, image-guided delivery and a candid discussion of both non-surgical and surgical options. His practice uses patient-specific preparation rather than assuming every PRP product is equivalent.
Read the primary PRP for Knee Arthritis treatment guide in Connecticut →
References & Further Reading
- Dubin J, Leucht P, Murray M, Pezold R. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons technology overview summary: platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for knee osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024;32(7):296-301.
- Almutairi AN, Alazzeh MS. Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e72057.
- Belk JW, et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(1):249-260.
- Oeding JF, et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Alternative Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Statistical Fragility Index-Based Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(12):3147-3160.
Related condition guides: Read our overviews of knee osteoarthritis and hip osteoarthritis for symptom patterns, diagnosis and how treatment choices are individualized.
